A Better Way For PR Event Follow Up Calls

Publicists have faced a common refrain from editors and producers over the years when it comes to following up information sent to them. “We’ll contact you if we’re interested in covering or doing a story,” is often what is heard when the call is placed. 

Recently I was working on making calls for an event in Washington D.C., working in conjunction with my long-time colleagues at Taylor.  Each member of the public relations team was tasked with specific outlets to pitch and follow up with to drive attendance to the press event.  The results were good, with multiple affiliate crews showing up, but the process is something that can be exhausting for all parties involved.  I just had my intern here at iMedia Public Relations  make follow up calls on a project.  It was an eye-opener for her.

On a daily basis a television news assignment desk is in a state of pandemonium, especially when it comes to major markets like the nation’s capital and New York City.  With so many events and so few crews to cover them all, news assignment managers must be magicians at times, trying to get to the most pressing stories of the day.  Then, when events like abandoned water coolers cause Times Square to be evacuated, the desk is thrown into full war operations.  Needless to say, a call from a publicist about their event is the last thing a desk needs to deal with.

The dearth of news crews, which has forced some markets to create LNS shared services, with one crew feeding footage to all partners, enables an event to get covered, but diminishes  the overall perspective that once was gained by having a reporter on-site to cover the event and ask pertinent questions to its participants.

Recently, I was speaking with the planning desk editor at a major Philadelphia affiliate. She began her search for my advisory on an upcoming satellite media tour by doing a key word search in her in box because at the time, she had 770 messages in the cue.

Stretched thin because of a lack of resources, news outlets cannot answer or follow up on every item sent by public relations professionals.  On the other hand, we as professionals would be doing our clients an injustice if we did not pursue coverage and ensure that their message was distributed to as many key media members as possible.

From an event public relations perspective there has to be a better way in communicating our message to electronic media. The days of sending the same advisory the assignment desk four and five times over the span of a couple of days has to end.

  Here are some of my thoughts for changing the process:

–         News affiliates should dictate that all media advisories be dated and sent to one central email destination.  Each advisory should receive a return email receipt.

–         The response, “If it’s on the AP Daybook,” we know about it should not be an excuse for an assignment manager looking to get you off the phone.  The AP Daybook is still an effective tool, but a streamlined process ensuring that an advisory is received and reviewed, will eliminate those rushed calls.  

–         A news producer at the station should review all advisories and serve as the initial filter, not an assignment manager crazed with sending a crew to a breaking news event.

–         The public relations contact for the event that makes it past the filtered stage should be notified if the event is in consideration or not. If not, they should be given a reason.

–         If for some reason, a crew is pulled, that event contact should receive notification. There’s nothing worse than holding up the start of an event because you’re expecting a confirmed crew to arrive and then find out they’ve been pulled after several calls to the desk.

–         There should be a cut-off date for sending and responding to event queries. Unless you are holding a breaking news event, like a press conference in a crisis situation, there should not be a need to have to send an advisory the morning of an event.

These suggestions are not perfect. However,  I think some changes are in order.  Needless to say, these are recommendations only for media calls regarding an event.  A feature-type story is still better-served by direct contact to the appropriate planning or news editor covering the beat, giving them enough time to determine whether a story is worthwhile and, if so, what resources need to be put in place.

Tom Cosentino


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: